By Wojtek Kolan - April 21, 2025
Falabella is scheduled to play Figl on Tuesday at 10:30 AM CET, in the M25 Santa margherita di Pula, Q3 round.
Form
L L L W W L L W L W
Form
W W W L L W W W L WDerived from the implied probability from the match winner, Falabella has a 74.03% chance to win.
PLEASE NOTE: Subscribe to the Matchstat.com tennis picks club to unlock implied vs our accurate predictions to discover value bets so you can win big.
| Prediction | Chance To Win |
|---|---|
| Maximilian Figl | 31.15 % |
| Lautaro Agustin Falabella | 74.03 % |
|
Above is calculated from odds. Login now to get our expert predictions. |
Falabella and Figl have played a total of 2 sets, with Falabella winning both. Their most recent match was at the M15 Bragado on April 2, 2024, in the third qualifying round on clay, where Falabella triumphed 7-6(5), 6-1. Will Figl turn the tables in their next encounter?
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lautaro Agustin Falabella | 1 |
| Maximilian Figl | 0 |
| Falabella | Stats | Figl |
|---|---|---|
| 36% (4-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (21-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 737 | Ranking | N/A |
| 713 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 27 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 52% (174-160) | Career Total W/L | 49% (75-79) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
Lautaro Agustin Falabella implied favourite from odds → 74.03%
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
M25 Santa margherita di Pula
Clay| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Total Matches | 1 |
| 0:00:00 | Last Match | 0:00:00 |
| 0:00:00 | Total Time | 0:00:00 |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Total Break Points Saved | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Service Hold (%) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Opponent Hold % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Total Points Won | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreak Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00 | Tiebreaks Per Match | 0.00 |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When it comes to the enchanting world of tennis, second serves can be as unpredictable as an umbrella in the wind! Recently, Falabella has twirled their second serve to win 43.71% of points, yet Figl, like a stealthy tennis ninja, has managed to snatch 45.09%. Although these numbers might sound like math homework, they're crucial for saying, “Aha! I know who's going to win!”
In the returning game arena, Falabella seems to have taken a page from a cat burglar’s manual, grabbing 47.95% of their opponent's second serve points. Figl, with the stealth of a caffeinated squirrel, outmatches them by winning 50.8%. Though when it comes to first-serve returns, Falabella sits at 28.89%, closely trailed by Figl, whom the servers just narrowly outrank with a 27.67%. These numbers are prime indicators of a thrilling match-up prediction!
Under pressure, Falabella shows the coolness of a penguin in an igloo, saving 53.55% of breakpoints, whereas Figl maintains poise akin to a tightrope walker with 50% saved. This information is louder than a marching band in times of in-game betting. On a wider scope, Falabella has won 52.83% of their matches in the past year, engaging in an epic 28 victories to 25 losses saga. Meanwhile, Figl has squeezed past with 54.69%, winning 35 matches of their 29 duels. It’s a statistical showdown!
Crushed velvet meet clay courts! On this favored surface, Falabella's record shines at 52%, just barely edging out Figl's 51%—and both had a contentious relationship with indoor hard courts. While past matchups have been an indicator, head-to-head Falabella has played one match against Figl, triumphantly winning both sets, like a hawk eyeing its prize.
A word from the extreme pressure moments, Falabella has played one tiebreak against Figl, triumphing with one victorious swoop, while Figl went zip—a neat trick for picking potential tiebreak outcomes! Factor in breakpoints, Falabella converted 28.42% of attempts, showing Figl's family a sign reading 41.51% of conversions.
Who's the magic number 329.92 and 190.94, you ask? Those are the average ranks of the opponents these players have faced, with Falabella hitting the lower hardwood of the rankings, and Figl challenging higher on the totem pole of tennis talent. In a mind-boggling 0 sets of deciding pain, both have swayed like grass in the breeze—actually, deciding sets are rare fossils in their prior matches.
Given these numbers, forecasts, and vigorous calculations, Falabella seems to step in as the wintacular wizard in this statistical face-off! Prepare your imaginary headset and grab some popcorn, because the clash of these tennis titans promises to be nothing short of legendary!
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats 
Valerio Aboian
Player
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
Player
Nikos Lehmann
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
79
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
Player
Leonardo Monferrer
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
Player
Franco Emanuel Egea
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 6-7(6) 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
45%
(
43 of
95)
1
Aces
4
15
Double Faults
7
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
45 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Villanueva
Player
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Maximilian Figl
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Figl
Player
Mario Mansilla Diez
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Figl
Player
Alessandro Spadola
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Silvio Mencaglia
Player
Maximilian Figl
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Maximilian Figl
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Falabella Vs Figl is now available here.
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (174/160) | Win/Loss | 51% (60/58) |
| 51% (390/371) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (140/124) |
| 50% (3657/3596) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1313/1251) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 286 | Aces Total | 67 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 522 | Total Double Faults | 169 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 293.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 192.06 |
| 57% (5901/10316) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2168/3378) |
| 64% (3796/5901) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1286/2168) |
| 46% (2024/4415) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (555/1210) |
| 41% (485/1169) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (168/367) |
| 42% (4326/10235) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1383/3285) |
| 52% (173/333) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (59/113) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (30/67) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (16/27) |
| 54% (50/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 39% (13/33) |
| 85% (176/149) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (63/53) |
| 15% (176/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (63/9) |
| 15% (158/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (55/8) |
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
